Keyword summary
68% 1 analyzed article/video 469 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Professional Fiduciaries Bureau results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.7% saturation with 426 hits . Analysis detected 1,229 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,876 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 74% (13,750 of 52,615 keywords). This Professional Fiduciaries Bureau is worse (more manipulative) than 73.90% of the peer group. Professional Fiduciaries Bureau
Keyword details
Total words: 1,876
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
74% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.9% percentile 3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 22.7% 22.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 22.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.4% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.6% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst