Keyword summary
24% 1 analyzed article/video 1,113 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Produce Safety results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Confirmation Bias , and Anecdotal , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 417 hits . Analysis detected 1,989 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,452 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 13% (32,767 of 37,536 keywords). This Produce Safety is better (less manipulative) than 87.30% of the peer group. Produce Safety
Keyword details
Total words: 4,452
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.7% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 9.4% 9.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst