Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video751 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pro Israel Pacs results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 40% saturation with 902 hits. Analysis detected 4,958 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,253 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.5% and a BS Rank of 88% (4,511 of 37,536 keywords). This Pro Israel Pacs is worse (more manipulative) than 88.00% of the peer group.
Pro Israel Pacs
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
88%Pro Israel Pacs (selected)7%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,253
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

88% percentile
025507510088.0% percentile
6.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 40.0%40.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 19.7%19.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 19.5%19.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 8.7%8.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 18.6%18.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 7.7%7.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.5%9.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 40.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 18.6%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 19.7%, sitewide 2.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 19.5%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Straw Man: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Horn Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos