Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Presidential Primaries Candidate Tracker results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Confirmation Bias, and Anecdotal, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 472 hits. Analysis detected 4,519 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,496 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Presidential Primaries Candidate Tracker is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Presidential Primaries Candidate Tracker
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 2,496
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 16.7%16.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 12.5%12.5%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 12.2%12.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 18.9%18.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 12.7%12.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.5%12.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 13.4%13.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 18.9%, sitewide 8.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 16.7%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 5.2%Burden of Proof: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 0.4%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 0.8%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 5.3%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos