Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video472 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Authority results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 42.2% saturation with 597 hits. Analysis detected 2,620 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,416 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.4% and a BS Rank of 91% (3,519 of 37,536 keywords). This Presidential Authority is worse (more manipulative) than 90.60% of the peer group.
Presidential Authority
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
91%Presidential Authority (selected)8%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,416
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

91% percentile
025507510090.6% percentile
7.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 42.2%42.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 24.0%24.0%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 22.9%22.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 6.9%6.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 42.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 24.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 22.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Loss Aversion: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 2.5%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 4.0%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.7%Slippery Slope: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Burden of Proof: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.4%Red Herring: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.1%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.4%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.9%Horn Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos