Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Predatory Calls results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 139 hits. Analysis detected 1,032 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,168 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Predatory Calls is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Predatory Calls
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Predatory Calls (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,168
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.2%11.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.1%2.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 9.7%9.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 11.9%11.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.1%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos