Keyword summary
43% 1 analyzed article/video 1,456 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Predators results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 564 hits . Analysis detected 2,860 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,368 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (30,115 of 37,533 keywords). This Predators is better (less manipulative) than 80.20% of the peer group. Predators
Keyword details
Total words: 4,368
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.8% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst