Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,163 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Precision Medicine Initiative results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 795 hits. Analysis detected 4,575 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,652 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (16,889 of 35,675 keywords). This Precision Medicine Initiative is worse (more manipulative) than 52.70% of the peer group.
Precision Medicine Initiative
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠0%Anthony Romano1%
⁠53%Precision Medicine Initiative (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,652
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

53% percentile
025507510052.7% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.4%8.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.5%Red Herring: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.7%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.4%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos