Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video467 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Power Saving results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Authority, and Pessimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 188 hits. Analysis detected 1,806 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,868 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 71% (10,763 of 36,950 keywords). This Power Saving is worse (more manipulative) than 70.90% of the peer group.
Power Saving
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
71%Power Saving (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,868
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

71% percentile
025507510070.9% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.1%10.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 9.6%9.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 7.2%7.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 8.9%8.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.5%Composition/Division: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos