Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,141 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Power Act results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 571 hits . Analysis detected 3,303 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,564 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 25% (25,872 of 34,293 keywords). This Power Act is better (less manipulative) than 75.40% of the peer group. Power Act
Keyword details
Total words: 4,564
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.6% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst