Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video364 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Port Washington results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 52.8% saturation with 769 hits. Analysis detected 3,217 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,456 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.8% and a BS Rank of 94% (2,488 of 37,536 keywords). This Port Washington is worse (more manipulative) than 93.40% of the peer group.
Port Washington
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
94%Port Washington (selected)9%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,456
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

93% percentile
025507510093.4% percentile
8.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 52.8%52.8%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 22.3%22.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 39.1%39.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 28.5%28.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 9.6%9.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 52.8%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 39.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 28.5%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 22.3%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos