Keyword summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,758 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pollen results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Optimism Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 706 hits. Analysis detected 5,871 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,914 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (29,227 of 35,044 keywords). This Pollen is better (less manipulative) than 83.40% of the peer group.
Pollen
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠0%Anthony Romano1%
⁠17%Pollen (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,914
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

17% percentile
025507510016.6% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos