Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 394 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Politics On Late Night results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Out-Group Homogeneity Bias , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.5% saturation with 301 hits . Analysis detected 3,324 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,182 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.2% and a BS Rank of 96% (1,503 of 37,536 keywords). This Politics On Late Night is worse (more manipulative) than 96.00% of the peer group. Politics On Late Night
Keyword details
Total words: 1,182
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
96% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 96.0% percentile 11.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 24.1% 24.1% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 19.3% 19.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 17.4% 17.4% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Keyword 13.2% 13.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 19.3% 19.3% Personal Incredulity Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 11.8% 11.8% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Keyword 11.7% 11.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 13.9% 13.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 17.3% 17.3% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 8.4% 8.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 21.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 25.5%, sitewide 19.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 24.1%, sitewide 3.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 19.3%, sitewide 7.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 19.3%, sitewide 1.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 17.4%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 17.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 3.7% Horn Effect: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 1.0% Personal Incredulity: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 0.2% Straw Man: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 9.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 2.7% Red Herring: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 0.7% Tu Quoque: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 0.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 4.6% In-Group Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 6.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.9% Composition/Division: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Special Pleading: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst