Keyword summary
38%4 analyzed articles/videos6,038 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Spending results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 1,806 hits. Analysis detected 14,908 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,849 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 10% (33,816 of 37,536 keywords). This Political Spending is better (less manipulative) than 90.10% of the peer group.
Political Spending
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
10%Political Spending (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 20,849
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

10% percentile
02550751009.9% percentile
1.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles20.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.4%7.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate