Keyword summary
⁠4%1 analyzed article/video5,146 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Interview results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 3% saturation with 619 hits. Analysis detected 3,983 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,584 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (50,028 of 50,197 keywords). This Political Interview is better (less manipulative) than 99.70% of the peer group.
Political Interview
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠1%Political Interview (selected)1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 20,584
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.3% percentile
0.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles20.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos