Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Political Ethics results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Tu Quoque , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 36.3% saturation with 1,720 hits . Analysis detected 8,552 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,732 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Political Ethics is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Political Ethics
Keyword details
Total words: 4,732
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 36.4% 36.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 36.4%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 8.1% Tu Quoque: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 0.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 5.2% Horn Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst