Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,546 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Divide results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Politically Right Leaning Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 935 hits . Analysis detected 8,646 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,184 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 59% (15,543 of 37,536 keywords). This Political Divide is worse (more manipulative) than 58.60% of the peer group. Political Divide
Keyword details
Total words: 6,184
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.6% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 12.9% 12.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 14.2% 14.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 15.1% 15.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 15.1%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 5.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Straw Man: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst