Keyword summary
11% 1 analyzed article/video 615 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Polar Bears International results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 214 hits . Analysis detected 1,454 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,460 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 49% (18,459 of 35,914 keywords). This Polar Bears International is better (less manipulative) than 51.40% of the peer group. Polar Bears International
Keyword details
Total words: 2,460
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.6% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 0.0% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.1% Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst