Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 847 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pod Save America results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Politically Right Leaning Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 34.2% saturation with 1,159 hits . Analysis detected 6,272 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,388 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 83% (6,724 of 37,536 keywords). This Pod Save America is worse (more manipulative) than 82.10% of the peer group. Pod Save America
Keyword details
Total words: 3,388
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.1% percentile 5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 34.2% 34.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 13.4% 13.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 14.3% 14.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Ad Hominem: Keyword 34.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 6.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 1.4% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Red Herring: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 0.7% Special Pleading: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.3% Tu Quoque: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 0.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst