Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video500 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Planned Parenthood Great Rivers results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Status Quo Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 129 hits. Analysis detected 1,008 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,000 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (27,059 of 37,536 keywords). This Planned Parenthood Great Rivers is better (less manipulative) than 72.10% of the peer group.
Planned Parenthood Great Rivers
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 2,000
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

28% percentile
025507510027.9% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos