Keyword summary
90% 1 analyzed article/video 1,190 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pinnacle Group results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 564 hits . Analysis detected 3,555 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,570 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 60% (14,768 of 36,675 keywords). This Pinnacle Group is worse (more manipulative) than 59.70% of the peer group. Pinnacle Group
Keyword details
Total words: 3,570
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.7% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 15.8% 15.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst