Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 684 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Phoenix Scottsdale And Tempe results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 153 hits . Analysis detected 1,020 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,736 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 12% (30,722 of 34,692 keywords). This Phoenix Scottsdale And Tempe is better (less manipulative) than 88.60% of the peer group. Phoenix Scottsdale And Tempe
Keyword details
Total words: 2,736
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.4% percentile 1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst