Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 457 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Phoebe Gates results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , and Halo Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 254 hits . Analysis detected 1,704 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,828 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 70% (11,609 of 37,536 keywords). This Phoebe Gates is worse (more manipulative) than 69.10% of the peer group. Phoebe Gates
Keyword details
Total words: 1,828
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.1% percentile 3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 11.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 0.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.4% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst