Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Phantomenigma results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Indoctrination, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 278 hits. Analysis detected 1,311 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,160 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Phantomenigma is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Phantomenigma
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
⁠0%Phantomenigma (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,160
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 8.8%8.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 0.5%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos