Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video544 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pfas Chemicals results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 289 hits. Analysis detected 1,436 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,176 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 42% (21,943 of 37,536 keywords). This Pfas Chemicals is better (less manipulative) than 58.50% of the peer group.
Pfas Chemicals
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
42%Pfas Chemicals (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,176
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

42% percentile
025507510041.5% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 13.3%13.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos