Keyword summary
⁠9%1 analyzed article/video1,760 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Volosin results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 4.4% saturation with 308 hits. Analysis detected 2,206 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,040 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠8% (51,695 of 55,640 keywords). This Peter Volosin is better (less manipulative) than 92.90% of the peer group.
Peter Volosin
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠8%Peter Volosin (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,040
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

7% percentile
02550751007.1% percentile
1.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos