Keyword summary
⁠4%1 analyzed article/video3,179 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Rodriguez results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 2.6% saturation with 334 hits. Analysis detected 2,423 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,716 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (43,799 of 43,907 keywords). This Peter Rodriguez is better (less manipulative) than 99.80% of the peer group.
Peter Rodriguez
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Wyomings Big Show1%
⁠0%Wyoming's Big Show1%
⁠0%Sweetwater Events Complex1%
⁠0%Ffa1%
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠1%Peter Rodriguez (selected)1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 12,716
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.2% percentile
0.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles12.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos

The Stakes for Wake⁠5%
The Assembly NC⁠3%By Dylan Halper⁠4%7/30/2026, 3:55:00 AM