Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Peter Hubbard results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma , Availability Heuristic , and Hasty Generalization , with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 104 hits . Analysis detected 331 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,258 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 56,851 keywords). This Peter Hubbard is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Peter Hubbard
Keyword details
Total words: 1,258
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 1.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst