Keyword summary
85% 1 analyzed article/video 477 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter G Andersen results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Anecdotal , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28% saturation with 400 hits . Analysis detected 1,344 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,431 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 76% (9,015 of 37,536 keywords). This Peter G Andersen is worse (more manipulative) than 76.00% of the peer group. Peter G Andersen
Keyword details
Total words: 1,431
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.0% percentile 4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 27.9% 27.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.5% 10.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 27.9%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 0.5% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Personal Incredulity: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.2% Middle Ground: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst