Keyword summary
93% 1 analyzed article/video 789 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Per Diem Benefits results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Ad Hominem , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 399 hits . Analysis detected 3,390 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,367 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 72% (10,622 of 37,536 keywords). This Per Diem Benefits is worse (more manipulative) than 71.70% of the peer group. Per Diem Benefits
Keyword details
Total words: 2,367
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.7% percentile 4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 11.7% 11.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 16.4% 16.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 16.9%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.7% Tu Quoque: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 0.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst