Keyword summary
15% 1 analyzed article/video 1,109 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pennsylvania Academy Of The Fine Arts results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Framing Effect , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 512 hits . Analysis detected 1,280 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,327 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 16% (30,311 of 36,004 keywords). This Pennsylvania Academy Of The Fine Arts is better (less manipulative) than 84.20% of the peer group. Pennsylvania Academy Of The Fine Arts
Keyword details
Total words: 3,327
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.8% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 15.4% 15.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 15.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 0.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.9% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.0% Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst