Keyword summary
89%2 analyzed articles/videos4,029 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pediatricians results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 1,877 hits. Analysis detected 14,167 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,087 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 41% (21,974 of 36,716 keywords). This Pediatricians is better (less manipulative) than 59.80% of the peer group.
Pediatricians
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
41%Pediatricians (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 12,087
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

40% percentile
025507510040.2% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles12.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 15.5%15.5%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 2.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos