Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,225 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peacebuilding results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and False Dilemma, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 421 hits. Analysis detected 3,468 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,900 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (31,372 of 37,536 keywords). This Peacebuilding is better (less manipulative) than 83.60% of the peer group.
Peacebuilding
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
17%Peacebuilding (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,900
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

16% percentile
025507510016.4% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos