Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,300 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Patti Smith results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Optimism Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 23.8% saturation with 2,296 hits . Analysis detected 7,987 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,661 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (23,243 of 36,568 keywords). This Patti Smith is better (less manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group. Patti Smith
Keyword details
Total words: 9,661
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.4% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 23.8% 23.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 23.8%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst