Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 101 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Partisan Redistricting results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , In-Group Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 37% saturation with 112 hits . Analysis detected 980 faulty-reasoning hits from 303 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17% and a BS Rank of 99% (607 of 37,536 keywords). This Partisan Redistricting is worse (more manipulative) than 98.40% of the peer group. Partisan Redistricting
Keyword details
Total words: 303
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
98% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 98.4% percentile 17.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles303 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 34.3% 34.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 37.0% 37.0% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 21.1% 21.1% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 19.8% 19.8% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 15.8% 15.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 15.2% 15.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 29.7% 29.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 36.3% 36.3% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 37.0%, sitewide 11.1% Framing Effect: Keyword 36.3%, sitewide 26.9% In-Group Bias: Keyword 34.3%, sitewide 6.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 29.7%, sitewide 19.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 21.1%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 19.8%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 7.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 3.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 14.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 4.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 2.7% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 2.7% Primacy Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst