Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,278 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Park Slope results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Optimism Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 535 hits. Analysis detected 3,304 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,112 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (27,242 of 37,536 keywords). This Park Slope is better (less manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group.
Park Slope
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
28%Park Slope (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,112
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

27% percentile
025507510027.4% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 10.5%10.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Straw Man: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos