Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,260 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Parasitic Worms results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 371 hits . Analysis detected 2,615 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,040 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 22% (29,508 of 37,536 keywords). This Parasitic Worms is better (less manipulative) than 78.60% of the peer group. Parasitic Worms
Keyword details
Total words: 5,040
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.4% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst