Keyword summary
⁠37%1 analyzed article/video831 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pamela Smart New Trial Court Petition Gregg New Hampshire results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Horn Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 386 hits. Analysis detected 1,844 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,493 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (13,709 of 37,536 keywords). This Pamela Smart New Trial Court Petition Gregg New Hampshire is worse (more manipulative) than 63.50% of the peer group.
Pamela Smart New Trial Court Petition Gregg New Hampshire
Keyword details
Total words: 2,493
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

64% percentile
025507510063.5% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.3%8.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 10.6%10.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 15.5%15.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Horn Effect: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 1.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos