Keyword summary
70%1 analyzed article/video1,107 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Palestinians Killed results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 406 hits. Analysis detected 2,915 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,321 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 54% (17,379 of 37,536 keywords). This Palestinians Killed is worse (more manipulative) than 53.70% of the peer group.
Palestinians Killed
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
54%Palestinians Killed (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,321
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

54% percentile
025507510053.7% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.2%8.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.2%12.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.5%3.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.9%3.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 5.0%5.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos