Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video752 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paisley Rekdal results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 196 hits. Analysis detected 1,646 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,008 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 26% (27,995 of 37,536 keywords). This Paisley Rekdal is better (less manipulative) than 74.60% of the peer group.
Paisley Rekdal
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
26%Paisley Rekdal (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,008
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

25% percentile
025507510025.4% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos