Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 770 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pablo Escobar results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Anecdotal , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 443 hits . Analysis detected 2,566 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,310 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 74% (9,902 of 37,763 keywords). This Pablo Escobar is worse (more manipulative) than 73.80% of the peer group. Pablo Escobar
Keyword details
Total words: 2,310
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
74% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.8% percentile 4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.5% 9.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 15.9% 15.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 19.2% 19.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 19.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 2.5% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.4% Middle Ground: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst