Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,619 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Overgrazing results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 936 hits. Analysis detected 4,022 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,476 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 27% (26,827 of 36,716 keywords). This Overgrazing is better (less manipulative) than 73.10% of the peer group.
Overgrazing
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
27%Overgrazing (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,476
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

27% percentile
025507510026.9% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 14.4%14.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos