Keyword summary
40% 2 analyzed articles/videos 497 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ottawa Senators results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.3% saturation with 664 hits . Analysis detected 3,530 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,119 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 62% (13,413 of 34,832 keywords). This Ottawa Senators is worse (more manipulative) than 61.50% of the peer group. Ottawa Senators
Keyword details
Total words: 3,119
Article count: 2
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.5% percentile 3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 21.3% 21.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 21.3%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 3.3% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
CBC 47% 7/12/2026, 5:36:57 PM