Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,670 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oswestry results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Halo Effect , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 432 hits . Analysis detected 3,285 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,010 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (28,515 of 37,536 keywords). This Oswestry is better (less manipulative) than 76.00% of the peer group. Oswestry
Keyword details
Total words: 5,010
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.0% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst