Keyword summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 5,184 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oscars results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Availability Heuristic , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 3,446 hits . Analysis detected 26,209 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,441 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 65% (13,300 of 37,536 keywords). This Oscars is worse (more manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group. Oscars
Keyword details
Total words: 17,441
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.6% percentile 3.6% BS Score5 analyzed articles17.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 19.8% 19.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 13.4% 13.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 19.8%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst