Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video473 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Osama Bin Laden results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 49.3% saturation with 933 hits. Analysis detected 4,437 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,892 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.1% and a BS Rank of 92% (2,989 of 37,536 keywords). This Osama Bin Laden is worse (more manipulative) than 92.00% of the peer group.
Osama Bin Laden
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
92%Osama Bin Laden (selected)9%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,892
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

92% percentile
025507510092.0% percentile
8.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 49.3%49.3%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 25.1%25.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 33.2%33.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 16.1%16.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.6%8.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 31.7%31.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 49.3%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 33.2%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Keyword 31.7%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 25.1%, sitewide 1.4%Ad Hominem: Keyword 16.1%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Red Herring: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.0%Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos