Keyword summary
56% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,250 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Opioid Settlement Funds results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 1,296 hits . Analysis detected 6,852 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,750 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (30,213 of 35,990 keywords). This Opioid Settlement Funds is better (less manipulative) than 83.90% of the peer group. Opioid Settlement Funds
Keyword details
Total words: 9,750
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.1% percentile 1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.3% 13.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst