Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 580 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Operation Legend results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Politically Right Leaning Bias , and Self-Serving Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 300 hits . Analysis detected 2,331 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,320 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 77% (8,460 of 35,697 keywords). This Operation Legend is worse (more manipulative) than 76.30% of the peer group. Operation Legend
Keyword details
Total words: 2,320
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.3% percentile 4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 11.8% 11.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 12.9% 12.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 15.9% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 3.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst