Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Online Scams results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Availability Heuristic, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 1,334 hits. Analysis detected 6,872 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,332 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Online Scams is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Online Scams
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Online Scams (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,332
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos