Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video4,094 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Online Abuse results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 3.9% saturation with 641 hits. Analysis detected 5,678 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,376 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of 1% (37,417 of 37,536 keywords). This Online Abuse is better (less manipulative) than 99.70% of the peer group.
Online Abuse
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
1%Online Abuse (selected)1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 16,376
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.3% percentile
0.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles16.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos